In an earlier paper1 I argued that the story of Jonah belongs in the book of KINGS. Jonah and the unnamed Judean prophet in 1K13 are paired by the author through literary links. The Judean prophet travels longitudinally to confront national paganism and is killed but not swallowed by a lion. Jonah travels latitudinally across sea to confront international paganism and is swallowed but not killed by a fish.
In a second paper2 I described how Luke stylizes his accounts of Jesus and Paul by incorporating peculiar details from the ministries of these two journeying prophets from KINGS. Luke introduces Jesus and Paul by first describing a confrontation with a supernatural being in the wilderness or on the road. Jesus encounters the devil in the temptation narrative, and Paul is confronted by God on the road to Damascus road. Jesus’ three temptations by the devil each evoke a theme found in the ministry of the unnamed Judean prophet. Details from Paul’s conversion on the road; his stubbornness towards the purposes of God, his three days of darkness, the scales that fell from his eyes, his commission to go to the gentiles, all trigger associations with Jonah.
This paper’s concern is the shared details along two Journeys for the Judean prophet and Jesus and also with Jonah and Paul. These four accounts have three meals or rejected opportunities for a meal. The meals are interpretive keys to the success of the prophet’s mission. Luke imports the two journey, three meal, framework into his two travelogues of Jesus and Paul.
Luke 9:51-19:27 is often called Luke’s travel narrative. The Galilean portion of Jesus ministry ends, and he sets his face towards Jerusalem. Jesus takes on the role of a journeying prophet, who is from the tribe of Judah. Luke decorates this account with associations to the story of the Judean prophet in 1K13, who made a similar journey as Jesus with a similar message. Both the Judean prophet and Jesus travel between Judah and Samaria to confront corrupt religious establishments.
Jesus’ ministry in Luke is described as two journeys. The first describes Jesus’ journey towards Jerusalem. The second is his journey through death and resurrection until the “kingdom comes.” While the Judean prophet in KINGS has two journeys, one starts from Judea and journeys north, then he has a truncated return journey. Jesus’ first journey starts in the north and journeys south. As the direction of the two Judean prophets is reversed, so are many of the details regarding meals.
The first meal on the second journey is the passover meal.
Jesus signals that his second journey is complete, that his kingdom has come with two meals. He breaks bread with a subset of his disciples, causing their eyes to open (L24:31), and then he meets another subset where he eats a piece of broiled fish(L24:42). The coming of Jesus’ kingdom commences with a humble meal.
These same elements are used to indicate the end of the Judean Kingdom. The penultimate king has his eyes gouged out (2K25:7), and the final monarch is reduced to being a spectacle while being fed at the pagan king’s table(2K25:30). Notice the failure of the Judges is indicated with Samsons’ eyes being gouged and him being a spectacle at a feast for the Philistine nobles. These themes of changed sight and badly sourced food are echoes of the fall narrative.
As Jesus journeyed towards Jerusalem to confront the secular and Jewish leaders in Israel, Paul’s ultimate goal is to appeal to Caesar in Rome. The Judean prophets, the one in 1K13 and Jesus, travel over land on donkeys(1K13:23, Lk19:30) . The international prophets cross over sea on ships.
Luke records two initial missionary journeys of Paul before picking up on his final journey to Rome. Luke draws strongly on details from the Jonah narrative. He describes two journeys in opposite directions and arranges details that conform to the pattern established by the Jonah story.
Jonah’s first journeys is towards Tarshish, in disobedience to the word of God. His second is to Nineveh as God commanded.
Paul likewise has two trips in opposite directions. Paul addresses the Ephesian elders in Acts 20:17-38 in a speech that recalls Samuel’s parting speech in 1 Samuel. After he is warned by disciples speaking in the spirit not to go to Jerusalem. (A21:4). He also visits a prophet named Agabus who prophesies of Paul’s bondage leading to the people urging him not to go (A21:12). Nevertheless, he goes to Jerusalem.
Paul meets with the Jerusalem leaders, then visits the temple.
The following night, the word of the Lord stood by him and said, “Take courage, for as you have testified to the facts about me in Jerusalem, so you must testify also in Rome.”(A23:11) This ends the first journey and begins the second. In the journey Paul is obeying the word of God. A number of details are shared between the two stories:
It is interesting to assemble inter-textual links between the accounts of the journeying prophets in KINGS and LUKE. But if these links are deliberate, then it is important to reason about their purpose.
The narration of the book of Kings feels like a broken record. Each king walking in the ways of Jeroboam, even meeting a second Jeroboam who walked in the way of his namesake. During the time of Jeroboam II, we are introduced to Jonah, and the text says the LORD saw the affliction of the Israelites, but there was none to help (2K14:26).
One might argue that the weight of the kingdom was held by the prophets. These charismatic, spirit-filled individuals brought the word of God to the kings and the people. Jonah spoke five words and the pagan city of Nineveh repented. But if the messengers fail to deliver the message, if they are compromised or their voices are captured by another, then the means for restoration and reinvigoration is lost.
The accounts of the two journeying prophets in KINGS served to show how the pillars that held the kingdom fell. Both journeying prophets were disobedient, but the reasons for the disobedience differed. The Judean prophet found rest under a tree before his journey was complete. He took a meal before he had finished the course. Luke contrasts this prophet with Jesus, who chastised the disciples for taking rest in the garden and vowed not to eat until his kingdom has come.
Jonah rejected a meal with a God under the tree after his journey was complete. He rejected the restoration that was given to Elisha under the broom tree after his journey confronting Ahab and the 400 Baal prophets. After the scales drop from Paul’s eyes, he takes the food offered him and straightaway preaches Christ, the anointed king, in the synagogues.
Luke applies the two journey framework to both the mission of Jesus and Paul. Their journeys are evaluated using the interpretive keys of meals given to us by KINGS. Jesus fasts until the kingdom comes, unlike the Judean prophet. He has two meals in the gospels last chapter. KINGS ends with the jewish king being fed at the table of a gentile king, as the Adam had his appetite directed by the serpent. The new king Jesus feeds his people.
In JONAH, no one eats. The fish vomits, the Nineties fast, and Jonah rejects God’s provision under the tree. Paul feeds the sailors, accepts hospitality from the Maltese noble, then entertains while in Rome. JONAH ends with the reader unsure of Jonah’s commitment to God’s plan for redemption. Acts ends with the reader unsure of Rome’s reception to Paul’s good news, but certain to Paul’s commitment.
References:
(https://theopolisinstitute.com/journeying-prophets-in-kings%EF%BF%BC/)
2. “Introducing the Journeying Prophets In Luke-Act” Scott Fairbanks
To download Theopolis Lectures, please enter your email.